06 3012405004818 Ciaco scrl onixsuitesupport@onixsuite.com 20260814T1805Z eng

COM.ONIXSUITE.9782872910953 03 02 i6doc 01 SKU Epub95272 02 2872910956 03 9782872910953 15 9782872910953 00 EA E101 15 101B 10 02 24666734 02 15 01 02 Rapports du GRIP 01 01 PESCO : European defence's last frontier 1 A01 01 Onixsuite Contributor ID 20298 Frédéric Mauro Mauro, Frédéric Frédéric Mauro 1 01 eng 10 POL000000 29 2012 3283 SCIENCES POLITIQUES 01 01 03 00 <p>The question that everyone is asking is whether these measures are just a flash of fire or whether they mark a genuine renewal. In other words, will they be followed by institutional prolongations and if so which ones?<br /> In order to put these initiatives in a sustainable and structural framework, the simplest idea is to apply the Lisbon Treaty. But of all the Treaty's provisions relating to defense, the one relating to « permanent structured cooperation » is the last one that was not implemented.<br /> That is why the institutions of Brussels are calling for it to be set up, and the High Representative has been instructed to make proposals to that effect.<br /> The problem is that no one remembers the intention of the drafters of the treaties, nor what «permanent structured cooperation» really means.<br /> Its understanding requires considerable analytical work and a great effort of synthesis.<br /> Moreover, let us not delude ourselves, ticking the box to eliminate the last obstacles to the establishment of a true European defense will not be enough. Indeed, as permanent structured cooperation was inspired by the Euro-zone idea, it is affected by the same design flaws as the Maastricht criteria.<br /> But if structured cooperation is not the miracle solution and its implementation is too complicated, what else?</p> 02 00 2016 was a year in which the European Union authorities took many measures in favour of defense: global strategy, implementation plan, action plan, preparatory action for defense research and roadmap to increase cooperation with NATO. 04 00 <p>INTRODUCTION <br /> What should we take with us from these initiatives?<br /> I. WHAT IS THE POTENTIAL OF THE TREATIES IN COMMON<br /> SECURITY AND DEFENCE POLICY MATTERS? <br /> A. The intentions of the authors of the Treaty <br /> B. Legal implications <br /> C. The political consequences to be drawn from potential remaining untapped <br /> II. WHY HAS THIS POTENTIAL NEVER BEEN TAPPED?<br /> A. Circumstances had a lot to do with it …<br /> B. … but it is mainly structural reasons that are continuing to block the launch<br /> of the European Defence Union<br /> III. DO WE REALLY NEED TO IMPLEMENT THE FULL POTENTIAL OF THE TREATIES? <br /> A. Is it possible? <br /> B. Is it desirable?<br /> IV. WHAT ELSE CAN BE DONE?<br /> A. Fake it <br /> B. Make it <br /> CONCLUSION </p> 01 00 03 02 01 D502 02 2037 03 1400 06 34616826c8ad9414dd908d816b6c7039 07 929203 https://i6doc.com/resources/titles/28001100125660/images/4d7e0d72898ae7ea3593eb5ebf20c744/HIGHQ/9782872910953.jpg 17 20170615T0833Z 02 01 D502 02 182 03 125 06 5d14b5c884a26d9324152dab7cafc0ac 07 40409 https://i6doc.com/resources/titles/28001100125660/images/4d7e0d72898ae7ea3593eb5ebf20c744/THUMBNAIL/9782872910953.jpg 17 20170615T0833Z GRIP 01 01 Dilicom GRIP 06 3052428660011 GRIP 04 01 20170615 11 20170315 02 WORLD 02 01 GCOI 28001100125660 06 03 9782872910960 06 03 9782872910946